www.Pure-Winners.co.uk
- Thread starter ArkRoyal
- Start date
Litty
Filly
hello kev...
a nice 12-1 winner I see! what I was trying to get across in earlier posts, here is a nice example. they tipped this up at 9-1 with sky bet who are not a bog bookmaker, therefore you wouldn't get the 12-1. I notice they haven't been doing too well with the balance and I found that too when I monitored them, I highlighted the problem about their recorded results because 1 month I showed a loss and they showed a profit, that's when they were having a few more winners. ie they were using the best odds in the morning to any bookmaker (not guaranteed) but if the sp was bigger they were claiming that too, made more of a difference when more winners were had, so no-one could get their claimed results!!!!
on a sidenote, they were also touting 'the Alistair stevens ' service and we all know the kerfuffle that caused lol.
anyway mate thanks for showing these trials very helpful, nice to compare paid ones to our own on the forum, great stuff.....
litty.
a nice 12-1 winner I see! what I was trying to get across in earlier posts, here is a nice example. they tipped this up at 9-1 with sky bet who are not a bog bookmaker, therefore you wouldn't get the 12-1. I notice they haven't been doing too well with the balance and I found that too when I monitored them, I highlighted the problem about their recorded results because 1 month I showed a loss and they showed a profit, that's when they were having a few more winners. ie they were using the best odds in the morning to any bookmaker (not guaranteed) but if the sp was bigger they were claiming that too, made more of a difference when more winners were had, so no-one could get their claimed results!!!!
on a sidenote, they were also touting 'the Alistair stevens ' service and we all know the kerfuffle that caused lol.
anyway mate thanks for showing these trials very helpful, nice to compare paid ones to our own on the forum, great stuff.....
litty.
ArkRoyal
Administrator
Ah, get where you are cominh from now mate. I have emailed them to see what, if any comment they have.
I provide results to BFSP as well as to advised BOG so you can use that as a comparrison.
4.25pm Thirsk - Ingleby Angel @ 5/4 Bet365 W
Selections 109
Winners 29
S/R 26.61%
BOG PL -15.14
BFSP PL -15.35
I provide results to BFSP as well as to advised BOG so you can use that as a comparrison.
4.25pm Thirsk - Ingleby Angel @ 5/4 Bet365 W
Selections 109
Winners 29
S/R 26.61%
BOG PL -15.14
BFSP PL -15.35
ArkRoyal
Administrator
With reference to Litty spotting that BOG prices were being used even if the quoted advised price was not from a BOG bookie, I emailed the Pure Winners and this is the reply:-
Hi Kevin,
This is news to me.
Pure Winners is essentially a part of Tipster Warehouse and results are updated by a member of our staff.
I will make him aware of the BOG problem you've made me aware of, and draw his attention to the ability to check this through oddschecker.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention,
Darren
Hi Kevin,
This is news to me.
Pure Winners is essentially a part of Tipster Warehouse and results are updated by a member of our staff.
I will make him aware of the BOG problem you've made me aware of, and draw his attention to the ability to check this through oddschecker.
Thanks for bringing this to my attention,
Darren
anonamouse
Colt
anonamouse said:[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsITSvL__do[/youtube]
what he said.
